<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Counselling Marriage &#187; Relationship Dynamics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://counselling-marriage.com/category/dynamics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://counselling-marriage.com</link>
	<description>Compassion : Connection : Courage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The effect of rescuing in relationships</title>
		<link>http://counselling-marriage.com/the-effect-of-rescuing-in-relationships.html</link>
		<comments>http://counselling-marriage.com/the-effect-of-rescuing-in-relationships.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 04:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Delyse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationship Dynamics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counselling-marriage.com/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The effect of rescuing in relationships
&#8216;For each person who volunteers to live the life of a tool, lest he turn out to be a knife, there is another who threatens to become a wound&#8217;.&#160; Sheldon Kopp.
<p>In coming across the above quote recently I was reminded of the pain caused by being caught up in this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h5><span style="font-family: tahoma,geneva,sans-serif;"><span style="color: rgb(60, 106, 60);"><strong>The effect of rescuing in relationships</strong></span></span></h5>
<div align="center"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><em><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">&lsquo;<span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>For each person who volunteers to live the life of a tool, lest he turn out to be a knife, there is another who threatens to become a wound&rsquo;.&nbsp; Sheldon Kopp.</strong></span></span></em></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">In coming across the above quote recently I was reminded of the pain caused by being caught up in this cycle. Back in my mid twenties I was a walking wound, and to compensate I tried to take care of others and become the tool to their healing. Thankfully I have come a long way over the years even though there are times when I can get drawn into this dynamic. I have found this description a useful way to understand how we are caught up in being dependent on each other&rsquo;s happiness. Partners will move between these three positions creating relationships based on powerlessness and fusion. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span id="more-349"></span>When I began my training I was first acquainted with this system in relationships as having three positions, persecutor, victim and rescuer. It is useful to conceptualize each position as a separate person for description, but more accurately they are aspects within our psyche that are activated in relationships. We express them in reaction to what we perceive and experience in others.&nbsp; However, you may recognize that you gravitate towards one characteristic in particular.&nbsp; Here is a description of each of these positions. <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: rgb(60, 106, 60);"><strong>Victim (Wound).</strong></span> <br />
	The victim carries beliefs about themselves as being a target for others hostility and rejection. They believe others are against them and responsible for their pain. They see their life in hopeless and helpless ways with obstacles at every corner preventing them from having what they really want. The victim expresses their helplessness to elicit caretaking. They do this by; guilt tripping, acting helpless, blaming, sabotaging success, afraid to take action, self deprecating statements, emotionality, and looking to others for direction. They are self-absorbed and want others to feel the way they do. For example, if their partner feels happy and satisfied this can be experienced as a slight to their feelings, after all &lsquo;can&rsquo;t you see I am hurting over here?&rsquo; (says the wound). <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">They find it difficult to tolerate rejection or criticism. The victim feels afraid to take responsibility for themselves, and often mistakes responsibility for blame or rejection. Taking care of oneself means that they will not be cared for as the only way is by manipulating it through being helpless and hurt.&nbsp; Being self-sufficient means being alone and disconnected, and so resent others for not responding immediately when they need them. Taking care of themselves is seen as a burden.&nbsp; The victim has developed this view from either being a target as a child or learning through wounded adults to manipulate others. They view relationships as providing them with the safe haven that they crave. The consequence is to put pressure on others to do the impossible and make up for everyone who has let them down. <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: rgb(60, 106, 60);"><strong>Rescuer (Tool).</strong></span> <br />
	The rescuer connects their self worth to being needed and taking care of others. They over function taking on things they perceive as helpful to their partner or that they think their partner &lsquo;needs&rsquo; to be happy.&nbsp; They have come to believe that their own desires are injurious to others and quickly deny them. They want to avoid conflict at all costs and are governed by guilt whenever there is any possibility that they could be responsible for hurting anyone. Some rescuers charge into situations where they perceive they are needed, taking on people as projects. They are also motivated by the fear that others will think badly of them. They carry shame about their own suffering or needs, striving to maintain a picture of themselves as in control and capable.&nbsp; The rescuer is very focused on others and becomes very adept at anticipating disaster. They can rescue by managing and organizing others, catering to other&rsquo;s emotional needs and attempting to provide whatever is requested, denying their own experience to protect others, saying what they think other&rsquo;s want to hear, explaining their partners behaviour to others and apologizing for them, taking responsibility for others, and attempting to take away someone&rsquo;s suffering by finding solutions for them. Through these actions the rescuer communicates a sense of them-self as capable and the other as incapable. <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">The rescuer tends to be self-sacrificing in the hopes of a return of love from their partner they have tirelessly taken care of. At their core they do not believe they are lovable and attempt to elicit love by doing for others. In this way they are driven by perfectionism believing that the only way to receive love is by being perfect. The rescuer will periodically fall into a pit of despair when everything falls apart and all their efforts have been to no avail.&nbsp; They end up feeling helpless and try to compensate by controlling more which often takes them into the persecutor position. From here they will become superior and contemptuous towards the victim when their efforts are not appreciated. They can also move into the victim position feeling used and abused. <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: rgb(60, 106, 60);"><strong>Persecutor (Knife) </strong></span> <br />
	The persecutor is a position that develops out of the victim and rescuer. For someone who maintains this position in relation to others has likely been the victim of extreme control or chaos and has learnt to protect themselves by attempting to control others.&nbsp; So feelings of worthlessness and vulnerability are buried deeply beneath a fear of loosing control. Their self worth is tied to being right and being superior.&nbsp; They attack to protect themselves from being attacked. They maintain their sense of self worth by perceiving others in an inferior position. The persecutor uses various methods to maintain control including, contempt, dismissing, attacking (verbally and physically), humiliating, blaming, raging, self-righteousness, bullying, sarcasm, stonewalling and withholding. In extreme situations violence and rage are used to control others. They deal with their own pain by inflicting it on others, feeling justified because of being victimized by others. Persecutors keep their vulnerability well hidden and see things in terms of weakness and strength, having contempt for what they perceive as weak in others. They will often move into the victim position in response to being challenged and held responsible for their behaviour.</p>
<p>	The victim and the rescuer will move into the persecutor position as an escalation of their attempts to control. The victim will persecute with blame and guilt by torturing others with responsibility for their pain and not being good enough to make them feel better. The rescuer will persecute others with their self-sacrifice and resentment that they are not appreciated for what they have done for them. The rescuer will often express their hostility in a passive aggressive way, because their need to be thought well of predominates. The rescuer and victim will react to each other in a never-ending spiral that escalates into increasing resentment and hatred. This cycle becomes increasingly abusive with both moving back and forth into the persecutor position.&nbsp; <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">When you are caught in this cycle it is not possible to develop deep intimacy and both partners feel powerless. Both the rescuer and persecutor project &lsquo;weakness&rsquo; outward and the victim projects their aggression and responsibility outward. In this way they maintain an incomplete sense of self through disowning these parts of themselves. There is a focus on others as responsible for your happiness and a belief that you can have control over others feelings and actions.&nbsp; You may at your core carry the belief that you are responsible for others feelings and therefore can control them. The victim does this by being helpless, the rescuer by being accommodating, and the persecutor by intimidating.&nbsp;&nbsp; As you operate from these positions in relationships you maintain a lack of connection to an authentic self by living your life through others.&nbsp; In this dynamic partners are viewed as unequal. <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="color: rgb(60, 106, 60);"><strong>How to live outside this cycle.</strong></span> <br />
	Learning to take responsibility for ones own life and keep working towards the goal of wholeness is of course the way out. Whatever it takes for you to focus on yourself and develop awareness will increase your sense of self. Identification is the first step in changing. Here are some pointers; <br />
	</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>Counselling.</strong> When we get stuck in dynamics we have a certain way of seeing things that has developed from our life experiences and can be very difficult to change. We tend to continue to see things from this perspective partly because we are so good at fooling ourselves and not looking at things we don&rsquo;t want to deal with.&nbsp; Each of these positions has an investment in staying caught up in it.&nbsp; We change in part because we are frustrated and because we are challenged usually by others to see things differently. A good therapist will focus you on the things that you are not as willing to look at by yourself and support you to face your fears. </p>
<p>	<strong>Self reflection.</strong> There are many ways to do this, meditation, reading, spending time by yourself doing the things you like to do.&nbsp; Doing more separate activities from your partner will help to develop more of a sense of self.</p>
<p>	<strong>Identifying your Fears. </strong>These interactions are driven by fear. Identify when you feel fear or guilt. Create some space before acting on it to calm yourself and reflect on what you really feel or desire in the situation.&nbsp; By slowing yourself down you can often identify what is triggering the guilt or fear and what decision you are making in response. Do something different to break the habit. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><strong>Deal with Conflict.</strong></span> <span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">As you learn to identify your reactions that cause you to avoid conflict you will become more aware of the truth of your experience in relationshps. Being honest risks others not being happy with you (you can&#39;t make them happy anyway), and having to deal with your differences. The more honesty that comes into relationships the more you will develop a foundation based on responsibility for your own happiness.</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://counselling-marriage.com/the-effect-of-rescuing-in-relationships.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neither in nor Out</title>
		<link>http://counselling-marriage.com/ambivalence-relationships.html</link>
		<comments>http://counselling-marriage.com/ambivalence-relationships.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Delyse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationship Dynamics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counselling-marriage.com/230.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article discusses the nature of ambivalence in relationships, and the resulting dynamics. </p>
<p>	Ambivalence occurs in intimate relationships when there is the coexistence of opposing emotions and desires towards the other that create an uncertainty about being in the relationship. It is our nature to split our experience into polarities, such as good/bad, right/wrong and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">This article discusses the nature of ambivalence in relationships, and the resulting dynamics. </p>
<p>	Ambivalence occurs in intimate relationships when there is the coexistence of opposing emotions and desires towards the other that create an uncertainty about being in the relationship. It is our nature to split our experience into polarities, such as good/bad, right/wrong and emotions such as love/hate, joy/sadness. One could say that we constantly deal with the opposite of our experience even if that is unconscious. As we become closer to our beloved and feel connected our experience is defined by the possibility of separation. Every time we say &lsquo;yes&rsquo; there is a &lsquo;no&rsquo; in the background informing our choice. If I am saying &lsquo;yes&rsquo; to something wholeheartedly, I can feel that yes in every cell of my being. &lsquo;No &lsquo; has been considered and rejected, however fleetingly, and my &lsquo;yes&rsquo; has the quality of certainty. If my desire to say &lsquo;no&rdquo; interferes with my &lsquo;yes&rsquo; it will be said with hesitation and doubt, and a lingering uneasy feeling that causes me to hold back; I am unable to fully commit to that yes. So not only does the opposite polarity define my experience but the degree to which I have integrated it into my consciousness will also affect my experience. Ambivalence could be said to occur when we are stuck between two polarities, and unable to reconcile them. <br />
	<span id="more-230"></span><br />
	All relationships contain opposing desires at times; this is the essence of conflict. The degree to which both ends of any polarity are conscious or hidden will affect how partners deal with conflict between them. In addition, how much each individual identifies with one end of the polarity will also determine the ability to resolve conflict. For example; if I identify with being kind and cannot tolerate the notion that I can be unkind, the unkind aspects to my psyche will become unconscious and drain energy away from my ability to be kind.&nbsp; I will not be fully present or authentic in my acts of kindness, and in all likelihood project &lsquo;unkindness&rsquo; on to my partner. By being rigidly identified with one end of a polarity and blocking awareness of the intolerable aspect means we cannot be fully present. If both individuals in a relationship are identifying their nature in this way, then what they create between them will also be an inability to tolerate certain experiences and make resolving conflict difficult. </p>
<p>	So if the nature of ambivalence is the inability to resolve an internal conflict that results in a lack of presence; a common way of expressing this is confusion.&nbsp; Ambivalence and confusion can be temporary states in all relationships, as we take time to resolve opposing or new information. However, where ambivalence becomes a chronic response to the world, confusion can become a defensive stance that protects us from being fully present.&nbsp; Expressing confusion habitually regarding what we want or need reinforces our sense of helplessness. &lsquo;I don&rsquo;t know&rsquo; does not give us a sense of mastery over our world, nor does it give our partner anything to go on. The inability of either partner to move forward in the relationship, either to leave or to move closer reinforces this helplessness.&nbsp; This chronic pattern becomes a problem in relationships by inhibiting deeper intimacy. </p>
<p>	A chronic pattern of ambivalence typically generates a dynamic in relationships where one partner is identified as &lsquo;uncommitted&rsquo; and the other as wanting commitment.&nbsp; Each partner will develop behaviors around this conflict in an attempt to pull their partner closer, or push them away. Each partner is expressing a particular role in the conflict over being in the relationship or out of it, but essentially both partners are creating the ambivalent tension between them by being identified with one end of the polarity. </p>
<p>	In other words, if we were to reduce this to a simple yes and no &ndash; the two ends of a polarity would be, &lsquo;yes I want more with you&rsquo; and &lsquo;no I do not want more with you&rsquo;. Partners are identified with either yes or no, and between them creating a stalemate.&nbsp; We can assume from this that both partners have not resolved their own internal ambivalence as neither of them can commit themselves to either being in or out of the relationship, and neither of them in this dynamic are fully engaged with the other. Often as one moves away the other will express more desire for the relationship, and the &lsquo;certainty&rsquo; expressed by the committed partner is a desire to hold on in reaction to the greater pulling away of the other.&nbsp; </p>
<p>	Because ambivalence pulls the individual and the relationship in different directions there is an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability that creates instability between the partners. There can be an atmosphere of impending doom and dissolution of the relationship. Partners often break up many times, or threaten to break up. As time goes on the relationship takes on the characteristics of an emotional roller coaster where they alternate between feeling hopeful and breaking up.&nbsp; Within this atmosphere, it can be very difficult for both partners to be themselves, and be open with each other. When faced with the possibility that it will end at any moment, anything that either of them believes could cause the relationship to end will be denied or held back. As each partner withholds aspects of himself or herself from the other, this creates distance, and thereby increases anxiety over the possibility of separation. It becomes a vicious circle. </p>
<p>	Typically, the partner who expresses commitment feels hurt and rejected by the other. The feeling that they are not good enough for the other to fully be with them creates a reaction of trying to please them, in the hope that they can make their partner desire them. The partner who carries more uncertainty often feels guilty that they are not able to give more, and finds it increasingly difficult to voice their true feelings. They start to dance around each other trying to anticipate how the other is going to react to them and hold back their thoughts, feelings or desires if they think that the other will react badly to them. In this way the relationship becomes more and more dishonest.</p>
<p>	Both partners are in a relationship that isn&rsquo;t the way they want it to be, but neither is able to leave. This is the essence of ambivalence. The preoccupation with separation, either wanting more separation, or being afraid of separation from the other, is the foundation of the anxiety that the relationship sits on. This preoccupation means that each individual cannot rest in the relationship; it is not a place of sanctuary and support but a place of deprivation.&nbsp; Even though there may be times where both partners can have fun and feel connected it is short lived, as both partners carry an underlying dissatisfaction that doesn&rsquo;t get resolved. A lot of time and energy gets taken up dealing with this underlying anxiety and deprivation.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>	From this perspective, the alternative to living with a chronic pattern of ambivalence would be to resolve internal conflicts that prevent one from taking action, making decisions, expressing how you feel, and being fully present.&nbsp; Issues around connection, intimacy and separation are often at the root of an ambivalent stance.&nbsp; To be fully here is to accept the fragility and imperfections of life, to go for &lsquo;it&rsquo; despite the possibility it could be gone in the next moment.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<p>	</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://counselling-marriage.com/ambivalence-relationships.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intrusion or Neglect?</title>
		<link>http://counselling-marriage.com/intrusion-or-neglect.html</link>
		<comments>http://counselling-marriage.com/intrusion-or-neglect.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Delyse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationship Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neglect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[present]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counselling-marriage.com/wp/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking about the continuum between neglect and intrusion.&#160; These aspects are present in every relationship to some degree most of the time. As we set a boundary with our partner they may crash into it! Some of us are more sensitive to intrusion while others are sensitive to neglect.&#160; Neither are pleasant! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">I have been thinking about the continuum between neglect and intrusion.&nbsp; These aspects are present in every relationship to some degree most of the time. As we set a boundary with our partner they may crash into it! Some of us are more sensitive to intrusion while others are sensitive to neglect.&nbsp; Neither are pleasant! You could say that both responses are a form of neglect as they disregard the needs of the other. So from this perspective, neglect on it&rsquo;s own is a message that you do not exist for me.&nbsp; From some of the research we know that a &lsquo;lack of response&rsquo; to your partner is more detrimental to the relationship&rsquo;s success than being mean and critical (intrusion). It seems that it is better to be seen negatively than not at all!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span id="more-78"></span></span></p>
<div class="awppage" id="awppage_2_59" style="display: block;">
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Of course there are extremes in this continuum that we can all acknowledge. At the far end of intrusion is abuse and violence and at the far end of neglect is failure to acknowledge a person exists or attend to basic needs of food, shelter, warmth etc. People will die of both, and relationships will crumble as a result. &nbsp; Most of us can deny that we are intrusive or neglectful when we identify extremes, but these forces are present for all of us. The majority of us are struggling with one another on a daily basis with &lsquo;milder&rsquo; forms of these processes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">It kind of gets a bit tricky when one person&rsquo;s expression of their needs is experienced as an intrusion by their partner. This conflict I believe is central to a lot of conflict in relationships. I know that it is in mine <img alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" src="http://psychotherapy-vancouver.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" /> We do not always get what we want! If you are sensitive to neglect then a refusal to give you what you want can be experienced as neglect.&nbsp; So we can dance around these ends of the continuum. Pursuing and withdrawing as we try to deal with the effects of these failures to connect.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Think about when you felt really connected to your partner. For me it is those quiet slower moments, when you have time to talk in depth and feel that the person is really with you and I am really with them.&nbsp; But who has time for that in this world? It is a real challenge! Being present to someone can only be achieved through focused attention and lingering. It really takes effort for the majority of us. And when we are present we see more of the other person. Intrusion and neglect results in a failure to really see our partner and their experience.When we are not seen or understood this taps into very basic relationship wounds that become recreated in our present relationships.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">So perhaps it would make it easier for all of us to accept that we are going to miss each other and repair those moments as we learn to be more present with one another.</span></p>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
	</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://counselling-marriage.com/intrusion-or-neglect.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How are you Attached?</title>
		<link>http://counselling-marriage.com/how-are-you-attached.html</link>
		<comments>http://counselling-marriage.com/how-are-you-attached.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Delyse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationship Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soothing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counselling-marriage.com/wp/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last night I was having a discussion with my husband about some of our experiences growing up and how that shows up in our relationship. I was reading about what in the field is called &#8216;attachment styles&#8217; and the different styles we have learned &#8211; it became really apparent where my husband and I can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Last night I was having a discussion with my husband about some of our experiences growing up and how that shows up in our relationship. I was reading about what in the field is called &lsquo;attachment styles&rsquo; and the different styles we have learned &ndash; it became really apparent where my husband and I can affect each other because of our different styles!!&nbsp; After a number of &lsquo;that is so you&rsquo; comments by both of us we could learn more about each other by understanding where this came from.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><span id="more-74"></span>So what does this mean you may ask?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">It is fascinating to me how important the first years of life are in creating these styles and patterns within us &ndash; that is where it all starts truly:) We may very much want to leave it all behind and believe that we can do just that.&nbsp; Perhaps it gives us a sense of power to feel we can rise above our parents influence &ndash; however, understanding attachment can be useful &ndash; if not interesting.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">The relationship as an infant with our [mothers] is instrumental in creating what is referred to as secure or insecure attachment.&nbsp; This comes down to developing an ability to both approach other people and separate from other people. The ease to which we can do this is determined by how in tune our mothers were with us in those first few years of life. Of course we don&rsquo;t remember those years but we can often get a sense of it from how our relationships with those&nbsp; people (mother)&nbsp; or from information regarding events such as hospital admissions.&nbsp; So what are our[mothers] doing that so affects us?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Being in tune with an infant is the ability to focus on the infants needs and respond to help the baby regulate their distress.&nbsp; A baby cries and the mother responds with soothing and the baby&rsquo;s nervous system learns to &lsquo;calm down&rsquo;. If the mother is not soothing the baby does not learn to calm down. If this happens over and over again, the babies nervous system starts to take on ways of dealing with this and develops what is referred to as insecure attachment styles. The mother can &lsquo;misattune&rsquo; in a number of ways; by just not paying attention and being self absorbed, only responds in a cold and practical manner, gets frustrated or feels a lot of anxiety herself, avoiding mutual gaze, resisting physical contact, wanting attention from the infant when the child does not. These things happen on occasions with all mothers, but your parents have their own attachment styles that gets reflected in their ability to respond to you as a baby on an ongoing basis.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Of course if you throw into the mix more extreme forms of abuse and neglect then the baby may develop a much more extreme insecure attachment. Adults who have had these experiences find relationships very challenging and people around them often don&rsquo;t know if they are coming or going.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">So often in relationships as adults we can find ourselves in relationships with partners that challenge our attachment styles &ndash; just like my husband and I do. His style developed in response to an unattuned mother who would resist being emotionally connected. So he learned to avoid emotional connection. He is on the end of what is called insecure avoidant. As adults these people tend to avoid emotional intimacy, keep their internal world to themselves, appear as if they don&rsquo;t need anyone, and find dependency frightening.&nbsp; In other words they tend to get anxious the closer they become to others.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">And people like me who have what is called an insecure ambivalent style tend to feel more anxious when separated from people close to them. This comes from a mother&rsquo;s inconsistant and unpredictable response. So these mothers will tend to encourage connection and then withdraw from it depending on their own emotional moods. So a baby may sometimes feel soothed by the mother and than abandoned.&nbsp; As adults we know that being close can feel good but what we don&rsquo;t feel secure about is being separated from others. So we can perhaps see how my anxiety would get activated by my husbands avoidance of emotional connection and his anxiety gets triggered if I come in too close. The good news is that we can change these patterns to create more secure attachments.</span></p>
<div class="post-time">&nbsp;</div>
<div id="copyright">
<p><!--ad--></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://counselling-marriage.com/how-are-you-attached.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
